Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. Why do you think people waste food? What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away?
There is a quote that respect for food is respect for life. However, there seems to be evidence that the majority of modern citizens are consuming victuals from restaurants and stores in a particularly wasteful way. From my perspective, this worrisome phenomenon resulted from several causes and several actions can be taken to diminish the quantities of food which is being thrown away
To initiate, there is a variety of explanations for the wastage of foods bought from food joints and eating houses. One fundamental justification is that the amount of food purchased by modern citizens is superfluous. It does not seem unreasonable to suggest that people these days have a tendency to order more food than the actual amount they can take in. Therefore, a bunch of residuals are being dumped on a regular basis. By the way of exemplifying, numerous buffet customers with eyes are bigger than their stomach, thereby picking up an excessive amount of food and only a small proportion of them have the habit of packing the leftovers. Another reason that is worth mentioning is due to the low cost of food thanks to advanced agricultural technologies and improved trade. Consequently, people tend to buy more food beyond their real need and stock up on unused foods, which often end up in rubbish bins
Unfortunately, there is no magic bullet for this problem. Nevertheless, there are some application solutions that should be taken into consideration. The first and foremost would be to enhance public awareness about the importance of food through educational systems or television programmes. A straightforward but effective measure is broadcasting documents about underdeveloped nations suffered from undernourishment. In the second place, leftover foods can be collected and processed with the aim of being a meal for the miserable ones such as the poor or homeless people
To encapsulate, the excessive amount of food purchased from food joints and eateries together with the low cost of victuals is the major culprit of the wastage of food. Then, some effective solutions that can be taken are to educate people as well as to distribute food to the nearby slum rather than discarding it
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-30 | Hoàng Ngọc Thảo My | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | nle.hngoc | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | minhtuvn23 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | phamminhtu | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | phamminhtu | 61 | view |
- Information technology is changing many aspects of our lives and now dominates our home leisure and work activities To what extent do the benefits of information technology outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Today TV channels provide man s sport shows more than women s sport shows why Should TV channels give equal time for women s sport and men s sport 73
- Some people believe that the aging population is good for business the economy and society Other howeve disagree with this view Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- what is the causes and solutions of air pollution 64
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, then, therefore, well, as to, such as, as well as, by the way, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1843.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13370473538 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00806250497 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554317548747 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.6462746996 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.642857143 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6428571429 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37615153676 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116547695725 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770190411546 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234713661138 0.151304729494 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478633450966 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.