It is true that a huge amount of food has been disposed of by individuals these days. In my opinion, the higher standard of life and the increase in crop production have led to this tendency and several effective solutions can be taken by both government and consumers to tackle the problem.
To commence with, there are two fundamental reasons why throw-away food has become increasingly pervasive in this modern world. First and foremost, due to the improvement in quality of life, people nowadays do not have to worry much about the insufficiency of food supply. This is because food is manufactured widely all over the world to meet the demand of residents with a relatively low cost,thus, a large number of buyers tend to buy excessive amounts of food. Furthermore, a higher yield crop also enables people to buy a surplus amount of food despite their real need. As a result, the incline of making unnecessary food purchases has become popular among a large proportion of the global population.
Fortunately, several measures could be taken to alleviate this problem. The first solution would be that the government should run global food campaigns and anti-food waste campaigns to raise consumers’ awareness about consuming food properly. Consequently, more and more people will be aware that wasting food is a pressing issue, encouraging them to become conscious consumers and mindful eaters. Moreover, applying a surcharge for consumers who do not finish food is also an efficient measure to solve this issue. A good example in this case is Dokki- one of the most well-known food chains serving korean food in Viet Nam. They have the policy that if customers’ remaining food contains more than 20% of the food they have taken, they will have to pay an extra fee of 30 dollars for their wasting food.
In conclusion, it is apparent that better life and growth in food production have contributed to the escalating amount of wasted food nowadays, and potent steps need to be taken not only by the government but also by the individual buyers to combat the problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 395, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , thus
... of residents with a relatively low cost,thus, a large number of buyers tend to buy e...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...idents with a relatively low cost,thus, a large number of buyers tend to buy excessive amounts of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, thus, well, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1737.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9770773639 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76107469449 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553008595989 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4613846493 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.071428571 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9285714286 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367026918775 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133767857485 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550342136703 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215068288968 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760893832682 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.