Many people argue that aside from making profits, entrepreneurs are also in charge of some duties toward the community. While involvement in several social commissions will do wonders for promoting the images of the companies, I maintain that this is not only the responsibility of individual corporations but also of every citizen and the government.
On the one hand, the idea of being socially responsible is beneficial for businesses due to the following reason. This can be a useful marketing strategy to improve customers’ perception of a brand. For instance, Hoa Phat - one of the most influential corporations with expertise in providing construction materials in Vietnam, has invested in sporting facilities to serve the local residents in most public parks in Hanoi. This social investment has made a good impression on the citizens there and a large pool of people consider Hoa Phat as a reliable company to purchase materials for construction.
On the other hand, there are a number of reasons why corporations should not be comprehensively socially responsible. First and foremost, many companies have contributed to society by complying with taxes and several vital regulations. Therefore, the government should undertake the commission of ensuring a well-qualified life for their residents. Moreover, Individuals also need to share social obligations. For example, they can participate in a voluntary organization aiming at protecting the environment. By undertaking several tasks such as raising people’s awareness about environmental preservation and volunteering to collect rubbish on the beaches, rivers, and public parks, they can give a hand to alleviate the rate of environmental pollution.
In conclusion, while contributing to the development of society can be greatly beneficial for the businesses themselves in terms of advertising their brands, I contend that the role of individual as well as government contribution is also of paramount importance. In my opinion, I believe that the joint effort of businesses, residents, and state authorities will help to facilitate better social sustainability.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ilitate better social sustainability.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1823.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66149068323 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42917517731 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596273291925 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.0974303303 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.214285714 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0714285714 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152678477654 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521670012461 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463899572272 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0953004225174 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352078969154 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ilitate better social sustainability.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1823.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66149068323 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42917517731 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596273291925 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.0974303303 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.214285714 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0714285714 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152678477654 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521670012461 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463899572272 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0953004225174 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352078969154 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.