At present days, it is easy to know through the use of technology of following, what people are doing as well as what they are talking about. However, majority of people do not know they are monitored in ways. I think that the benefits of this alteration are for more than the drawbacks.
There are several plus points connect with the rising use of monitoring people. First and foremost one is that it is being easier to found criminals by locating their place through their mobile phone. Provided that criminal escapes after committing crime and get out of reach of the police, who are engaged with catching offenders, they can track the mobile phone of criminal and caught him. Moreover, if an offence done in a place which is covered by CCTV cameras, what can record video footage, the police can easily get some evidence such as time, pictures of the criminal, from the video footage and can arrest the offenders. That is how, security camera and phone tracking helping people and it can be predicted that it will reduce crime rate and make life more safe.
On the other hand, It is being easier to kill someone through the use of technology. A terrorist could be e able to figure out the position of his target and kill them within one attack, because, criminal can know exactly where his target is and what is the perfect time to attack. For example, Mr. Donald Trump killed the general of Iran Qasam Sulemani through a drone attack, while the Sulemani was crossing the airport of Lebanon. All steps of this action were taken by the use of technology of tracking. Consequently, the people all over the world got scared and it may causes World War III, which is an expected to everyone.
To conclude, in spite of the rising usage of technology of monitoring can reduce crime through aiding police to catch criminals, it may cause killing of people. I think if it is used in good ways, it would give us more merits.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, for example, i think, such as, talking about, as well as, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62682215743 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33296639387 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553935860058 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6486420172 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.8 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8666666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2666666667 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279224152592 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919653385624 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596803364562 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164770557594 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633852923181 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.