With the burgeoning growth of technology and digital devices, world has seen advancements in many aspects. However, there have also been some wrongdoings which led to surveillance of human activities. While some public know about the hidden eyes and ears, many are unaware about them. Whether we like it or not, satellites from outer space are observing a lot of our activities. Is this a development we should welcome?
Certainly, there are many benefits. Firstly, to keep the system in a proper shape, governments use the help of devices such as cc cameras, live traffic monitoring satellites and the photographs captured by officials. As a result, traffic related accidents and unlawful acts can be noted, thereby resulting in necessary resolutions. This in return helps the citizens. Moreover, keeping a watch on suspected criminals and threats of society, disasters or violence can be stopped in the first place. This shows that monitoring acts as a primitive step.
On the other hand, there are some concerns. Considering the raise in cybercrimes, it can be understood that there is a downside to this development. There are some nefarious hackers who steal the information of individuals to sell to third parties. For instance, Google, a tech giant was recently proved guilty by European Union for sharing the private details such as photos and phone numbers with other agencies. This is an undesired consequence for any internet user.
On the whole, it can be observed that alongside positives there are hidden threats associated with the public monitoring. Although it is inevitable that more and more ways will be available to surveil, it is our responsibility to limit or delimit its usage accordingly.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, first, firstly, however, moreover, so, third, while, for instance, such as, as a result, on the whole, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2274368231 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93757687047 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624548736462 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.381348043 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.4444444444 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3888888889 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157942658072 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435585334594 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0290944194569 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0825818130058 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279063283463 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.