In the modern era, everything is run by technological gadgets. People use it everywhere in their day to day life. Authorities and law enforcement are taking good use of this development, mainly for security purposes. This essay will discuss the benefits and drawbacks of monitoring people.
With the advent of technological improvements countries, are finding it difficult to protect their borders and people from possible threats. As a result, they are using many surveillance facilities like spy cams, audio records to retrieve pieces of information for safety purposes without noticing others.
It is clear that all countries' security services do surveillance to protect people from terrorism and its bad sequences and to provide peaceful and trustful live to them. Many countries are using this same technique in their borders also, to protect their country from any invaders. Moreover, multinational companies are also using these surveillance facilities to protect their confidential documents leaking out of their premises.
In addition, it is useful for parents to keep their children under control when their kids are away. Also, there is one fact, grandparent uses smartphones containing GPS which was given by their relatives to know their location when they go away.
On the other hand, there are some ethical problems while authorities do this, some people may feel himself under pressure, especially when monitors are located again to them.
Overall, all the technological developments made by humans so far have both negative and positive effects. According to this essay, it has been clear that the advantages of these acts are clearly outweighing its disadvantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 22, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
... noticing others. It is clear that all countries security services do surveillance to pr...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, moreover, so, while, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47509578544 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93866984357 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.624521072797 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5168926629 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.071428571 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179217638399 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631253050184 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367048059456 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0934138235959 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502028507976 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.