Nowadays there is an increase in social problems involving young people because more parents spent time at work than with their children. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is undeniable that the number of juvenile offenders is increasing at a breakneck speed. This tendency is widely believed to be a consequence of lack of parental supervision. While is it irrefutable that parent plays an important role in the growth of youngster, there are several other factors that worth considering.
On the one hand, there is a variety of explanations for the adverse effects of the shortage of parental guidance on the child's development. First and foremost, parents are the role model of the child. The lack of parental supervision reportedly led to inadequate ethical thought and perspective, which is the underlying reason for youngsters to commit a crime. An illustration of this is that by observing their parent striving to work to earn for a living may fostering a deviant thought that worship the materialism, which misled them to the social catastrophes to make money. Another reason for this phenomenon is originating from inappropriate television programmes. Since being left alone, children allegedly spent most of their recreational time to watching television or using the social network including numerous improper contents such as violence or sexuality that alluring the child without the presence of their parent. Furthermore, they are vulnerable on the internet and usually become the potential victim for the criminals.
Nevertheless, the other factors that affect the growth of the child should not be underestimated. In the first place, sometimes it is the parent that is the decisive key to the spoilage of the child. A child whose parent is the former criminal is believed to be more likely to fall from grace as they had witnessed and being affected by their parent's point of view since their childhood. Secondly, it caused by the unsuitable educational system. It seems to be shreds of evidence that modern education in various nations, especially the developing ones, are being excessive emphasized on academic success rather than the comprehensive development of the child. This contributed to the astray of the child as they are disregarded the moral code and tend to have the conception of being prosperity at all cost
To summarize, the negative impacts of lack of parental supervisor is undeniable since the parent is the role model of the child and youngster are vulnerable to the bad guy on the internet. However, other factors such as the adverse effect of the family background or the inappropriate educational system are greatly contributed to the child's astray
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-05 | sanjana rani | 56 | view |
- Some people feel that entertainers such as film stars pop musicians or sports stars are paid too much money Do you agree or disagree Which other types of job should be highly paid 84
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The Pie chart gives information about the country of birth of people living in Australia and the table shows where people born in these countries live 82
- People often think about creating an ideal society but most of the times fail in making this happen What is your opinion about an ideal society How can we create an ideal society 84
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging theenvironment. What can governments do to address these problems?What can individual people do? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 809, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nception of being prosperity at all cost To summarize, the negative impacts of la...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, such as, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 13.1623246493 220% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2117.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 407.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20147420147 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01829326531 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503685503686 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 672.3 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.7001312249 49.4020404114 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.529411765 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9411764706 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41176470588 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132516293491 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0416094512698 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361086228484 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0783770133275 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378481857323 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.