People are having more and more sugar-based drinks. What are the reasons? What are the solutions to make people drink less.
There is not even a shadow of doubt that beverages that contain a large amount of natural sugar or artificial sweeteners have become more prevalent than ever. From my perspective, this worrisome trend originate from numerous different causes and actions should be taken to diminish the intake of sugar-based drinks for people's sake
To initiate, there is a variety of explanations for the tendency of having an increasing consume of drinks contained sugar. One fundamental justification is that this is one of several consequences of the demanding work schedule. It does not seem to be unreasonable to claim that the majority of citizens these days snowed under an enormous amount of workload on a daily basis, thereby requiring an additional energy supply for consecutive working hours without taking a break. Irrefutably, drinking energy drinks can provide them with contemporary strength to accomplish their assigned task. Another reason that is worth considering is that soft drinks are allegedly addictive according to various scientific research. Therefore, if being absorbed for a long time, these beverage drinkers are unable to change their drinking habit or even take a sip of healthy distilled water
Unfortunately, there is no magic bullet for the trend of drinking water fulfilled with sweeteners. Nevertheless, there are certain solutions that can be implemented. One straightforward but effective measure is to raise public awareness about the long-terms pernicious impacts of soft drinks on the physical well beings of each individual. When having excessive consumption, beverages may attribute to various disorders such as obesity or cardiovascular-related diseases. Hence, there should be a mandatory subject about maintaining the healthiness that focuses on interpreting the adverse effect of these energy drinks to youngsters, the major customers of the beverage industry. Furthermore, there should be additional taxation imposed on soft drinks companies to decrease their productivities and passively raise the price of sugary drinks with the aim of breaking the habit of purchasing and consuming drinks
In conclusion, the domination of sweetened drinks is due to the requirement of energy at workplaces as well as the addiction within these drinks. Then campaigns to raise public awareness about the hazards of energy drinks and taxation enacted on beverage companies should be done for the welfare of the general public
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'numerous'.
Suggestion: numerous
...ve, this worrisome trend originate from numerous different causes and actions should be taken to d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 304, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...s should be done for the welfare of the general public
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, then, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2079.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55882352941 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13989024482 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572192513369 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 662.4 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.9702349556 49.4020404114 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.923076923 106.682146367 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7692307692 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22137341171 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742314981994 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547021910067 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1360348386 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468563971737 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.0946893788 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 50.2224549098 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.56 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.