In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might be the case Do you think this a positive or negative situation

Essay topics:

In some countries, owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people. Why might be the case? Do you think this a positive or negative situation

It is irrefutable that having owned a house instead of renting one is considered essential in several nations throughout the world. From my perspective, this tendency resulted from numerous underlying reason and may bring both adverse and beneficial impacts on oneself

To begin with, there is a variety of explanations for this phenomenon. First and foremost, it is one of several consequences caused by the traditional conception. There seem to be shreds of evidence that in the ancient time, houses are considered as the most valuable property that a person, particularly man, had to achieve not only for himself but also for descendants. Therefore, nowadays this thinking still has a great influence on the ambition of having private accommodation in many parts of the world, especially the Eastern countries. Another reason that is worth mentioning is the social status. In many countries, houses reportedly believed to be the symbol of wealth and superiority. Thus, owning a dweller is an effective means of proving yourself and satisfying self-esteem.

However, it is nearly impossible to consider this trend as a negative or positive situation. On the one hand, owning a house may have advantageous impacts on each individual. The most striking benefit of it is due to the fact that having owned a house provide the home-owner with a much stable and economical dweller when compared to the renting house. By the way of illustration, the renting fees are usually paid on a monthly basis, which may be real trouble for people with a seasonal or irregular occupation as they can become homeless anytime. The daily expenses may also cost the tenant a much greater deal of money in the long term. On the other hand, the disadvantage of emphasizing on owning a house should not be underestimated. It is apparent that the home-owner may face financial struggle or serious debt right after they purchased their dream house since they are burdened with a wide range of loan. Furthermore, several people even engage in illegal usury to meet their demand for buying a house.

To sum up, the tendency of considering the act of owning a house as very important is based on the traditional conception and the wish of raising social status. While this trend may bring some benefits including providing the owner with a stable and economic accommodation, it also can make them fall into serious debt to pay back the home loan

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 281, Rule ID: A_MUCH_NN1[1]
Message: Maybe you should omit the article "a", leaving only 'much'.
Suggestion: much
...ned a house provide the home-owner with a much stable and economical dweller when comp...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 282, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed a house provide the home-owner with a much stable and economical dweller when ...
^^
Line 7, column 222, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... bring some benefits including providing the owner with a stable and economic acc...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, may, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, by the way, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2024.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 403.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0223325062 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8964672876 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553349875931 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 645.3 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9889128298 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.444444444 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3888888889 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206515051781 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059235629303 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0315694766744 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116857830648 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272448804509 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.