People nowadays work hard to buy more things. This has made our lives
generally more comfortable but many traditional values and customs have been lost
and this is a pity. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is undoubtedly true that we are living in a consumption-orientated society and nowadays people are strive their best for work to buy things as much as they can. Although this tendency has made life generally more comfortable, many people argued that the raise of such materialism may lead to the loss of many traditional values or customs. Personally, I strongly agree with this statement
In the one hand, the comfort and easiness that the modern lifestyle brings should not be underestimated. First of all, along with the growth of technology, people these days can take advance of the cutting-edge devices to help them with household chores. These amenities including microwave oven or refrigerator is truly obliging. Secondly, when it come to communicating, it is needless to say that so fast and convenient a communication is attributable to the electronic gadgets. Personal computer, smartphone or tablet are good cases in point.
Nevertheless, this way of living is reportedly responsible for the disappearance of traditional values and customs. Firstly, there seems to be some evidence that many traditional festivals are at risk of being forgotten. People allegedly prefer travelling to preparing customary food or doing conventional ritual. This is resulted from the hectic and nerve-racking life that drain all their energy. Secondly, there is the overlooking of family cohension. It may seem that people always up to their ears and do not have enough time for their spouse and children. It may catalyze a soulless society
To sum up, the modern lifestyle may have some benefits such as the usefulness in housework or the conveniently communication but they also brings the loss to many traditional values and customs
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 350, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comes'?
Suggestion: comes
...or is truly obliging. Secondly, when it come to communicating, it is needless to say...
^^^^
Line 7, column 140, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'bring'
Suggestion: bring
...onveniently communication but they also brings the loss to many traditional values and...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, such as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27436823105 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22713798599 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595667870036 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8497329018 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.357142857 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236653995961 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640533462447 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621977644777 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136543126021 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.089801452991 0.056905535591 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.