The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995 to 2002
The chart illustrates the figure for time spending on telephone calls in the UK between 1995 and 2002. The statistic is measured in minutes
In general, while the local-fixed line experience a wide oscillate, the national and international-fixed line, along with the mobile phone, gradually shoot up in a similar period of time
To be specific, the local phone call was unpredictable. Introducing at nearly 70 billion minutes in 1995, the time people using local-fixed line dramatically rocketed by roughly 20 and reach a record high of 90 billion in the year 1999. However, it followed by a sudden decline in the subsequent year and sank to hit low, which exactly on par with its starting point
On the other hand, a telephone call on the national and international scale or using the mobile receivers witnessed a steady soar over the year. Regarding the domestic and global line, it climbed from above 40 to 60 million minutes in 2001, before hit a peak of over 60 million in the following year. And when it comes to the mobile phone, although there were approximately 5 billion minutes in the opening year of the research and increase quite slowly in the first 3 years, before enjoying a boom during 4 final years
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...02. The statistic is measured in minutes In general, while the local-fixed line e...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... phone, gradually shoot up in a similar period of time To be specific, the local phone call...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 374, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...phone, although there were approximately 5 billion minutes in the opening year of...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, regarding, so, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1016.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8380952381 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85850761056 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609523809524 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.3896441002 43.030603864 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.333333333 112.824112599 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.0 22.9334400587 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8333333333 5.23603664747 226% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166243079598 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0943969987945 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814651767472 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116594637753 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103303422381 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.2329268293 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...02. The statistic is measured in minutes In general, while the local-fixed line e...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... phone, gradually shoot up in a similar period of time To be specific, the local phone call...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 374, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...phone, although there were approximately 5 billion minutes in the opening year of...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, regarding, so, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1016.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8380952381 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85850761056 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609523809524 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.3896441002 43.030603864 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.333333333 112.824112599 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.0 22.9334400587 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8333333333 5.23603664747 226% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166243079598 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0943969987945 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814651767472 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116594637753 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103303422381 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.2329268293 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.