It is believed that these days, media channels solely cover bad news regarding issues and urgencies, which has detrimental influences on each person as well as society, instead of highlighting the positive ones. Personally, I agree with the aforementioned idea, but I think its advantages should be mentioned.
On one hand, there are certain merits of posting problems and emergencies on social media. First, that individuals are bombarded with a barrage of bad news on a daily basis adversely affect their mental health. This is because life with numerous responsibilities is stressful as it is, and learning more about such reports makes them more stressed out and pessimistic. If the worst comes to the worst, they are likely to suffer from depression. Moreover, the growth of unpleasant reports leads to brain drain. For instance, if Afghan young population daily excessively expose news about wars and terrorist attacks, they will hold a grim view about the prospect of their nation and move to another places which ensure their safety.
On the other hand, a concentration on bad news and emergencies brings certain advantages. First, crime news can play a role in educating the public about justice, or it can prevent offenders and help individuals know how to protect themselves from crime. For example, people may avoid walking alone late at night, especially women, in order to evade sexual harassment crimes. In addition, reports of serious accidents could raise the public's awareness of road safety. Therefore, they might obey the rules because they know the consequences of irresponsible driving habits.
In conclusion, I believe that unpleasant news has negative impacts on individuals as well as the whole society; however, this tendency may have merits in some ways.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 435, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
...ts of serious accidents could raise the publics awareness of road safety. Therefore, th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27719298246 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84222221982 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652631578947 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.550671147 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.428571429 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7857142857 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105685766427 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0355928778011 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0302546534786 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0609846387091 0.151304729494 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0112052028266 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.