Nowadays, there is a trend that reports of media focus on problems and emergencies rather than positive development. Some people think it is harmful to individuals and to society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, it has become much easier for people to catch up with the latest news on urgent issues as a result of the extensive media coverage of these problems. While I agree that this trend can be detrimental, I believe that there are still several beneficial effects.
On the one hand, the increase in the number of problems and emergencies reported can be seen as negative for both personal and broader social reasons. On an individual levels, the trend towards media reports focusing on these aspects of life may lead to a loss of the sense of security. Consequently, citizens will become over-cautious, which will hinder the establishment and development of certain social relationships. From the society’s perspective, the more people are exposed to these negative pieces of information, the less reliable they find the authorities to be. In order words, their faith in the management of governments may be badly shaken, which can be potentially dangerous to the operation of existing society.
On the other hand, the personal and social arguments given above can be considered from the opposite angle. Firstly, it is the responsibility of the mass media to report news on current problems such as disasters and infections, which allows people to better protect themselves from any potential financial loss, health damage and physical injury. For instance, thanks to the timely reports on a devastating storm approaching Ho Chi Minh City in 2016, the evacuation of residents from all affected areas were performed promptly and effectively, and no casualty was incurred. Secondly, problems are more likely to be resolved efficiently when they are covered to keep people informed. There are certainly issues, especially those related to the economy and environment, which cannot be settled by any individual or organization alone.
To conclude, although the aforementioned trend may have certain adverse impacts, I suppose that it can also bring about several benefits for individuals as well as society.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, for instance, i suppose, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30745341615 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99718403647 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605590062112 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3443303585 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.461538462 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7692307692 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5384615385 7.06120827912 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148715641374 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520852352193 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408106327313 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0893622102677 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0152894648259 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.