Technology growth has changed the way of living and it makes severe impacts on people’s lifestyle. Every aspect of life has been affected by technology and without doubt it causes the way that people have used for their social interactions.
Thanks to technology, interactions have become very convenient and easier than the past. For example using smart phones and computers for interactions are becoming common instead of visiting people by person. People send their massages by pressing a bottom of their electric gadgets. They can see their family members and friends by having a video call or in order to hear their voice they call on their phones. While in the past they had to send letters or meet their relations to be aware of their conditions.
The way people interact with each other makes a comfortable life for them because they have to work hard for covering their daily expenses and separating a time for visiting others has been becoming almost unachievable for them. Therefore, instead of bearing traffic jams to visit their relations they are preferring to call them rather than meeting them.
However, humankind is a social creature and making interactions using technology, sometimes is boring. Furthermore, there are some feelings such as loneliness or depression that could overcome spirits and make a sense of uselessness. The energies that we receive by meeting our loved ones can not be transmitted to us behind the smartphones.
All in all, Thinking about suicide nowadays can be because of the kinds of interactions that we have to draw on. Therefore, technology, has provided a comfortable life for people but make them more alone.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 228, Rule ID: MASSAGE_MESSAGE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'messages'?
Suggestion: messages
...ing people by person. People send their massages by pressing a bottom of their electric ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 303, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ffic jams to visit their relations they are preferring to call them rather than meeting them. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18315018315 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74998155074 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4334674036 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.071428571 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226749382223 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835722657164 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0873904133489 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140107406863 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0946197773001 0.056905535591 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.