Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because oftechnology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that peoplemake? Has this been a positive or negative development?

Essay topics:

Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of
technology.
In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people
make? Has this been a positive or negative development?

Today, because of the development of technology, people are adapting their communication ways with others. While several aspects are affected by technology, I think that it is a positive improvement.
The relationships among us have converted because of the changing technology in recent years. Firstly, emails are replacing the traditional mails that we used to commute, in the past, with each other. Secondly, some social networks that are growing wider around the global, and these sites are helping us to connect and interact with a majority of people all over the world. Moreover, Facebook and Zalo also offer some services that support us to make a call or send a message to a relative who lives far away from home with a cheaper fee and shorter time. For example, Facetime is a smart app that can offer a free video call to people who stay wherever in the world.
Therefore, no one can refuse the advantages that modern technology brings to us. Because of fast and convenient emails, we can save the amount of time which we can use to do more works. Besides, the distance between us is made closer by some social network websites which provide us lots of tools to communication around the global. For example, some important conferences now can implement through the Livestream, which is the breakthrough app that supports indirect meetings through WiFi-connected smartphones or tablets.
In conclusion, although the technology has changed the relationships among human, I believe that this tendency has several benefits for people.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 524, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... WiFi-connected smartphones or tablets. In conclusion, although the technology h...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, i think, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1290.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09881422925 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84762790302 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604743083004 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3718259402 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180249498855 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692086055132 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642731514282 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121039403037 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0675023000777 0.056905535591 119% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.