Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make. Has this become a positive or negative development.
In recent decades, there has been a remarkable improvement in our interactions with other people owing to advancement in technology. Hardly can one find it difficult this days to keep a distance relationship unlike in the time past when there was no technology. The of advent of technology invariably has had a positive impacts in the lives of every human, by improving our communication as well as fostering relationship irrespective of the distance apart.
There is no doubt that technology has improved the way people communicate with each other currently. With the use of technological gadgets, such as phones, laptops, iPads, one can easily hold a meaningful conversation or meetings with family and friends. This advancement has saved many people the stress of traveling to a far distance in other to hold same meeting. For example, many years ago when there was no phones, people residing in the village have to travel down to the city for family meeting with relatives that dwell in the cities. This stressful situation has be curtailed by the advent of phones. Relatives can easily put a phone call across to people in the urban area all thanks to modern technology, which has helped to foster relationships between families.
Similarly, the impact that technology has on human is a positive one because it has made the world a global village. People can easily connect to the world from the comfort of their homes with use of mobiles and internet. Individuals make friends with people in another country through social networks and can as well learn other peoples culture. For instance, Facebook, a social network site, is a common site where people from different geographical zones with different culture background can share ideas and have decent conversation. Indeed, this advancement has enormously improved individuals relationship with one another even if they will never get to meet themselves.
Conclusively, undoubtedly, technology has greatly affected our relationship in positive ways and has also increase family unity because one can interact seamlessly with family through mobile phone and laptops even without traveling a distance to meet them
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ology. Hardly can one find it difficult this days to keep a distance relationship un...
^^^^
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...easily hold a meaningful conversation or meetings with family and friends. This a...
^^
Line 3, column 372, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tance in other to hold same meeting. For example, many years ago when there was n...
^^
Line 3, column 576, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...he cities. This stressful situation has be curtailed by the advent of phones. Rela...
^^
Line 5, column 665, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ther even if they will never get to meet themselves. Conclusively, undoubtedly...
^^
Line 7, column 107, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'increased'.
Suggestion: increased
...ationship in positive ways and has also increase family unity because one can interact s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nity because one can interact seamlessly with family through mobile phone and lap...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, similarly, so, well, for instance, no doubt, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1831.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26149425287 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9219079796 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537356321839 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5828427762 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.066666667 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.93333333333 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333893072919 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117666059107 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690073827279 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202865892345 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296043334882 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.