School and university students learn lesson far better from their teachers than from other source, such as internet and television. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
It is argued that when learners at different levels are taught by teachers, they reach a greater understanding of the lesson than any knowledge shared on the media. I disagree with this view because lectures on the internet can be understood in the same way as those delivered by any teacher.
Interaction with teachers facilitates learning. As students communicate frequently with their instructors, they understand basic details about education. This continues throughout their academic journey. For example, students at a high school in Lagos accredited their mastery in economics to the face to face discussions they had with the teacher in charge. This helped them gain more knowledge about the rudiments of the study. Therefore, teachers can help students understand important topics.
Nevertheless, lessons delivered online can be understood in the same manner. Many teachers today have platforms where they share knowledge about interesting topics. Learners go to such sites to download video files which would still make the same meaning as those taught face to face. Television channels are also in this league. For example, I learn how to count French numbers on facebook. I did not have to wait until any teacher was in an interaction before understanding it. Therefore, effective learning can also happen online.
In conclusion, teachers deliver basic knowledge in a way that it would be understood, and the internet can also achieve that., despite the absence of a live instructor.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1275.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 236.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40254237288 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88617182282 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601694915254 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1183030261 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.6875 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.75 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5625 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128663468119 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0424286192211 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0240025649461 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.07768264264 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244197735927 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.