Nowadays the way people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development?

It is a well-known fact that modern technology has infiltrated into human daily lives in various aspect. Recently, there is a considerable change in relationship between people owing to the technology, which would be shed light on in the following paragraphs. Furthermore, the opinion about this development would be elucidated as well.

It is widely acknowledged that the technological improvement substantially affects the interaction of human beings in terms of education. Over the past few decades, without the advanced technology, people usually have the education by attending to school. However, in the present time, the internet-based service enables students to have lectures wherever they would like to. This advancement of distant learning brings convenience to students who have difficulties to attend to school. To demonstrate, students who dwell extremely distant to the school are capable of taking advantage of this net-based service. As a result, I hold my perspective that the technology is a positive development as far as schooling is concerned.

On top of the influence which technology affects with respect to the education, the interaction between people has been tremendously influenced by the soaring advancement of the technology as well. The prevalence of social media narrow the distance between people. For illustration, in the past centuries, people usually rely on hand-written letters for communication. However, it is more convenient for people to interact with their friends and parents by Facebook and Line irrespective of how far it is. In this case, the technology not only makes human life more convenient, but also breakthrough the barrier between people.

By way of conclusion, as argues above, the penetration of the modern technology into human daily lives has significant influence on human relationship. To ensure a better convenience of life, I suggest that technology should be further developed.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, well, as a result, with respect to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57912457912 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27316717056 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552188552189 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4497536936 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5625 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5625 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6875 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24850935214 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717026863931 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487832271646 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135424102312 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031724833264 0.056905535591 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.