Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening? What can government do to help reduce the amount of rubbish production.
Lifestyle has undergone substantial changes over recent decades. Presently, in this materialistic world, a profuse amount of trash is being produced almost everyday by masses. This has become a burning issue. This essay intends to account for reasons and remedies to address this worrying concern.
There are multifarious reasons behind this situation. First and foremost, excessive consumerism and materialistic attitude of masses are responsible behind the problem of rubbish. To demonstrate, nowadays, a wide range of products are being advertised with exaggeration by companies in order to boost the sales. As a result, people get stimulated to buy things whether they need or not. In addition, most of people are under the influence of materialism and competitiveness. They have tendency to buy more and more latest products so that they have more superior possessions than their neighbors or relatives. This leads to replacement of old household stuff with new goods and older ones are thrown into landfill sites excessively. Needless to say, buying things unnecessarily under the influence of adverts and materialism results in surplus production of waste in the form of old household stuff thrown to dumping sites.
Further emphasizing on my point of view, growing usage of non- biodegradable material also contributes noticeably in the rise of rubbish production. To make it clear, nowadays, in many parts of the world, the use of polythenes and other non biodegradable material for packaging of vegetables, fruits and households things is rising dramatically. Such non-biodegradable things do not decay easily and contribute in the problem of rubbish. What is more, the use of plastic in the manufacturing industries is another major factor, causing heaps of wasteful products. Hence, it is quite clear that non recyclable materials also surround us with the concern of rubbish.
Numerous remedial measures can be taken to vanish this situation. To commence with, the watchword three R's should be promoted in order to nip this evil in the bud. To be specific, three R's referred to reduce use, reuse and recycling of waste should be made a slogan so that people not only avoid buying things unnecessarily, but also help in collection of waste materials by using dustbin. As a result, rubbish production is likely to be addressed by this effort. In addition, discouraging people and manufacturers towards usage of non biodegradable materials can also be a reliable panacea to curb this problem.
To recapitulate, undeniably, an enormous growth in the rubbish production every year has become a menace for environment. Therefore, government, manufacturing industries and people should make collaborated endeavours to overcome this problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 292, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...emedies to address this worrying concern There are multifarious reasons behind th...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 392, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...gs whether they need or not In addition most of people are under the influence of materialism ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 501, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'latest' (without 'more') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: latest
...ness They have tendency to buy more and more latest products so that they have more superio...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 501, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'more the latest'.
Suggestion: more the latest
...ness They have tendency to buy more and more latest products so that they have more superio...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 910, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... household stuff thrown to dumping sites Further emphasizing on my point of view ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...ehold stuff thrown to dumping sites Further emphasizing on my point of view growing...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 650, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... surround us with the concern of rubbish Numerous remedial measures can be taken ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 602, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a reliable panacea to curb this problem To recapitulate undeniably an enormous g...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, so, then, therefore, in addition, as a result, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 41.998997996 169% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2281.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 428.0 315.596192385 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32943925234 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0569561663 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523364485981 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 730.8 506.74238477 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 428.0 20.2975951904 2109% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 2281.0 106.682146367 2138% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 428.0 20.7667163134 2061% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 88.0 7.06120827912 1246% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.67935871743 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236477879503 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.236477879503 0.084324248473 280% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120875462016 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234695271677 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 217.7 13.0946893788 1663% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -371.4 50.2224549098 -740% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 171.4 11.3001002004 1517% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 15.11 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 29.18 8.58950901804 340% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 61.0 9.78957915832 623% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 173.2 10.1190380762 1712% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 218.0 10.7795591182 2022% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.