Nowadays, as women and men have to work full-time, household duties should be equally divided. Do you agree or disagree?
People differ greatly in their views about the division of housework tasks between males and females. I total contend that there should be equality in sharing household responsibilities in both genders.
On the one hand, this division exerts positive effects on both women and men. Regarding females, not only are they relieved from the burden of housework but they also have more time to relax and spend on their work. As a consequence, if women are shared chores, this trend can be attributed to their higher job productivity and work-efficient compared with those who do the majority of the housework. From the perspective of males, they are freed from the pressure of being the sole breadwinner in the family when women now work full-time to contribute more to the family budget. This may be conducive to an improvement in men’s mental health because they can relieve their stress under the financial burden in the family.
On the other hand, the equal dividing of household duties can be a catalyst for the development of the family ’s solidarity. First and foremost, family relationships will be tightened if men and women spend more time on the same activities together. This is because the more time genders spend on doing chores together, the more opportunities they have to understand each other. Furthermore, the sharing of duties between males and females in housework is a significant approach to educate children about the sense of support. These children, as a result, may become people who have the spirit of sharing and empathy in the future.
To sum up, I am firmly convinced that it is beneficial for both men and women and children when there is a banlance of doing household duties in the family due to that females have more time for their work and relax, men can reduce stress as breadwinner, and children are taught about the sense of sharing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-29 | truognchinh | 73 | view |
| 2017-06-17 | grahamoneil | 61 | view |
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan in the year 2009. 29
- The best way to solve world’s environmental problems is increasing the cost of fuel. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- The international community must act immediately to ensure that all nations reduce their consumption of fossil fuels a.g gas and oil. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- In some countries, governments are encouraging industries and businesses to move out of the cities and go into regional areas. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- Children’s education is expensive. In some countries, the governments pay some or all of the costs. Do the advantages outweigh its disadvantages. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 308, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... are taught about the sense of sharing.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, regarding, so, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95899053628 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73007569455 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501577287066 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3411153958 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.923076923 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3846153846 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290383302243 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103456042314 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592679552652 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179415027156 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366136299506 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.