Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand, agree or disagree?
The preference of the nuclear energy as a choice is debatable. Now-a-days, this energy is suggested to be a preferable choice for meeting the overwhelming need. This essay will discuss, why nuclear energy is the best choice for meeting the rising demands.
Quite a lot of people, suggest that the nuclear energy is the best source for producing the electricity, as they are less vulnerable, when compared to others. They are likely to produce less carbon-di-oxide, in contrast to other types of sources that are used for generating the current. As, there is less production of harmful gases, there is minimal damage to the environment, by reducing the acid rain, the global warming etc. As, an illustration, in China before using this source for manufacturing the current, their pollution rate was uncontrollable, but after the usage of this, it came down by 80%. In earlier times, the China was using the fossil fuel which released, huge amount of toxic gases, and meanwhile, they were very harmful to both the environment and the humans.
However, there is a dramatic surge in the usage of the former, as their installation does not require any cause to humans. The raw material needed in nuclear energy, is Uranium and they do not consume a lot of space, whereas, the other energy providers, occupy a plenty of space. To support, the wind energy is also a preferable one in terms of pollution, but when it comes to the space, this requires a huge area and it will not allow the people nearby to stay peacefully. The noise created by this energy provider will not allow the public to live around it, and they also occupy a lot of residential area.
In conclusion, it is strongly evident that the nuclear power station provides many benefits to the public, in terms of pollution, generating electricity and they also do not disturb the regular lifestyle of the surroundings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 153, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rms of pollution, generating electricity and they also do not disturb the regular...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, whereas, while, in conclusion, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1565.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.890625 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78056698074 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5125 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5709293259 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.384615385 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6153846154 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202236448833 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0912866921307 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100409320049 0.0667982634062 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136343204766 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131740512032 0.056905535591 232% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.