Nuclear power is a necessary evil. Despite the potential human and environmental consequences of radioactive fall out, nuclear energy is a genuine alternative to non-renewable energy source. Do you agree or disagree?
With exponential increase in the world population, every country is in the thirst of finding alternative energy sources. Nuclear power is believed to be one of them with colossal production of electricity while some people are concerned about its disastrous consequences in cases of radioactive fallout. Personally, I advocate the use of this source because of its promising future to human race.
First and foremost, while fossil fuel is coming to inexistence, it is urgent people find a stable resource to replace them. Nuclear power has long been proved to have the capability to satisfy increasingly immense demands of human without doing harm to the environment when it functions properly. If there were no energy, countries could not develop and a future of extinction would be waiting for everyone. Hence, nuclear power nowadays is not an option, but a must.
Secondly, many protestants may see risks in using this source when accidents happen. It is true that in such terrible incidents, the consequences are incredibly hazardous. Human have learnt this lesson from the occurrence of Chernobyl or Osaka and will definitely forget it. However, with the advance of technology, risks are minimized and safety rules are applied strictly in nuclear power plants. Besides, like what people have done to the nature which is full of dangers and threats, we can tame and control it to make it serve our needs.
In conclusion, despite worries about harmful effects of nuclear power, I strongly believe that currently no other resources can be as efficient as this source. We just need to find solutions to prevent radioactive crisis and with modern technology and development of science, this is not an impossible thing.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17921146953 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80531843806 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641577060932 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5392412145 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.214285714 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179732232734 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559531094116 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499540084748 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10652580496 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303070700287 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.