In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transportDisucss both the

Some people argue that governments should spend more money on developing bullet and metro rail facilities, while others support the idea of spending money on upgrading current public transport system. This essay analyses these viewpoints in the following paragraphs and concludes with my opinion.

To begin with, many people support the plan of investing in intercity rail networks because they save their valuable time. To explain it further, these types of trains run faster than any other public transportation facilities. They stop only at major stations and hence they are not delayed like passenger trains. This makes them a boon for super busy business professionals who cannot afford to be held up in traffic.

On the other hand, improving / upgrading the current government owned transportation methods could also solve the issue of possible traffic blocks in towns. That means if public transport is reliable more and more people will start using it to move around the cities for shopping and entertainment. If the government could properly maintain the present modes of transport, many people will stop using their own vehicles because public transportation is always cheap and affordable. This way, the traffic jams caused by private vehicles on the road can also be reduced to a great extent.

In conclusion, the government should invest in both fast trains and other existing modes of transport because they are both required to ease traffic congestion in the cities.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, so, while, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand, to a great extent

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1254.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 236.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31355932203 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69496415767 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.631355932203 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4878492711 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4545454545 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189299089812 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664926538676 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702892931354 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128958186547 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056112624974 0.056905535591 99% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.