There is a debate whether country should spend money for building new rapid train railway lines or bettering current public transportation. I completely agree with the latter view and will explain the reasons.
On the one hand, rapid train is advantageous in reducing traffic congestion. This is because, rapid train can operate swiftly and has special railway lines. Thus, using money to construct more rapid railway lines will support more rapid trains to operate. The more rapid trains that operate, the less traffic jam will occur. However, because rapid train has expensive fare, the possibility for people to be willing to switch from their personal transportation to rapid train will be low. Finally, traffic congestion can not be overcome by the existence of rapid trains.
On the other hand, public transportation also has possibility in overcoming traffic congestion. By bettering public transportation, people will feel more comfortable and safe in riding them. Thus, they will likely to be willing to switch from their personal vehicles to public transportation. Moreover, public transportation such as Bus or MRT usually have affordable prices, the possibility for people to switch from their private vehicles will be big, and traffic congestion can be overcome.
In conclusion, rapid train is beneficial in reducing traffic congestion because of its swift speed and special railway. However, because public transportation have more affordable fares than rapid train, which has bigger possibility in encouraging people to switch from their personal vehicles, I completely agree that the money should be spent in upgrading existing public transportation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, moreover, so, thus, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58039215686 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95958682445 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 176.041082164 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482352941176 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5824447399 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.642857143 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2142857143 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225846256976 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0928891264861 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763624981752 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170148776341 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04267967983 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.