In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is believed that spending a lot of money on constructing new railway systems is essential in some countries. However, some people believe that improving the current public transportation is more beneficial. In my opinion, building new railways and fast trains provides more benefits for people living in a nation.
Allocating a large budget on existing public transportation to develop it could have both advantages and disadvantages. On the one hand, preparing public vehicles with high quality tempt people to use them instead of their private cars and motorbikes, which cost more than transportation of the public. In addition, the number of vehicles in the streets will reduce which causes the traffic decline, and emission of carbon dioxide to the air decrease. On the other hand, trying to improve outdated busses and use them again might be a waste of money since it is expected that they will be broken down and need repair again after a while.
In some countries, developing new rail lines and high-speed trains seems essential to residents in a country. Using trains for traveling between cities is less expensive than planes and ships, and as a result, more people can afford it. Constructing suitable railways with fast trains will connect towns and countrysides and let most people travel every day to get their works. In other words, people living in both rural and urban areas have accessibility to get further cites from their hometown that could help them have more job opportunities.
In conclusion, whether constructing new railway lines or extending the current transportation of the public can have both advantages and disadvantages in a country. From my point of view, the benefits of new and high-speed trains outweigh the improving existing public transport.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 281, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he improving existing public transport.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21799307958 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87976597084 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532871972318 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3489513739 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 116.0 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368240877545 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131238971755 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626911668462 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230132346233 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0700996169051 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.