Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible
in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that
some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Some people perceive that it is beneficial to share all kinds of information in the scientific studies, business and academic world. In contrast, some people think it may not be appropriate to share that information due to its value and importance. In the world of information explosion, people have these kinds of the discussion all the time. I think there are few aspects we can pay attention to for this controversial topic.
There are some benefits for people to be able to access the information. First, people can enhance their knowledge and ability thru the process of retrieving the information. They can get what they are looking for when they have problems and doubts. It may help the industry to save their time on training new people by providing their own tools. On the other hand, If the information is transparent and public, it can be prevented from the secret criminal activities to sabotage the records or studies. Due to its shareable features, the information can be guaranteed as public knowledge.
However, if all the information is shareable, there may not be any confidentiality for the industry and company. It may cause threat on employees’ relationship. Take employee’s salary as an example. What if everyone can learn each other’s salary in a company? I believe the employees may feel injustice of jealous between each other due to difference reward they receive in the same position.
To sum up, I think there are pros and cons for the information sharing protocols. It is necessary for people to access all the information, but we have to take security and privacy into the consideration when we share the information.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, may, so, i think, in contrast, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1394.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05072463768 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0059976454 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6860921928 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2352941176 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.29411764706 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251643501014 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851212986624 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0892437911681 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155320629899 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0968075962579 0.056905535591 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.