In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
First of all, government should invest large sums of money in building broad gauge and narrow gauge railway lines in order to facilitate numerous railways services for shorter and longer distance places for a fair amount of people because it is a better way to diminish pollution and make cities greener and eco-friendly, in many cities in the world, a very huge number of people are depend upon railways because this is very cheaper and affordable mode of transportation. With the maximum usage of it. Prominent changes can easily be carried out in people’s life. That is why government should emphasize on modern railways’ infrastructures.
Secondly, it has been strongly noticed from many developed and developing countries that excess amount of disbursement has continuously been allocating in updating their railways transportations systems with help of scientists and engineers of their respective countries. Because it plays a paramount role in common people’s life. For instance, in Japan Bullet train has been established to provide very quicker transportation service with high amount of luxurious amenities as well as affordable rate. Many vital services through railways and bullet train are possibly provided to public at the great level. Meanwhile train journey, people feel peace of mind and sterling comfort that make them allure in traveling in railways as compared to another mode of transportations.
Thirdly, in my point of view, government should provide required amount of financial revenue on railways sector and its betterment. But this should not be done at the cost of others means of transportation. Other- wise there would be a big risk for losing their tight position over others transportations modes. Having twenty-first century’s scenarios and circumstances. Remarkable development has to be executed as quickly as possible.
To sum up, railways infrastructures as well as another important transportation systems should be revamped and well modified so many people would inspire to travel in railway as a result, the intensity of pollution would be reduced and the world would become a quite gorgeous place for stunning life standard. The atmosphere around the world may be found less polluted.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 615, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
... provided to public at the great level. Meanwhile train journey, people feel peace of min...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 97, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'railways'' or 'railway's'?
Suggestion: railways'; railway's
...required amount of financial revenue on railways sector and its betterment. But this sho...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 372, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d the world may be found less polluted.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, while, as to, for instance, as a result, as well as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1910.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48850574713 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16870905411 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580459770115 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 114.524952931 49.4020404114 232% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 119.375 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8125 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246310025791 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671969384129 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479938936912 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144772991362 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325711764231 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.