Traveling by trains between cities and countries has become a mainstream means in modern society, especially with the development of fast trains. While some argue that investment should be put on existing transport system, i am of the new railway constructions.
The currently-used public transport has served for years to support early transportations. The old cursive roads with up and downs not only brought new stuffs to remote villages in the mountain but also introduced its culture to the outer world.
However, it might need more capitals to improve the roads above instead of building new lines to adapt to the advanced technology, such as fast trains. Firstly, cost will be used to move out the old tracks. And then more people and instruments need to be arranged to measure the capability of new area to see if it suit the new type of tracks. It might be quite risky to construct new railway upon the old lines because of the obsolete facilities used years ago.
To build new lines will also bring chances for development in new areas, which is being implemented in most cities in china. A good example will the city of hefei, where most of the fast trains go to the south railway station and old trains remains the previous destination at hefei station in the north. By separating the use of old and new, both of the northern and southern parts of the city have become more balanced in economy.
To conclude, despite some convenience of the existing transport, i would agree with the opinion that large sums of capitals should be spent on constructing new railway lines mostly considering advanced level of technology and more balanced development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ld be put on existing transport system, i am of the new railway constructions. ...
^
Line 5, column 316, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'suits'?
Suggestion: suits
...the capability of new area to see if it suit the new type of tracks. It might be qui...
^^^^
Line 9, column 66, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... convenience of the existing transport, i would agree with the opinion that large...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, then, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91166077739 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72474595741 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56183745583 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3239648802 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.833333333 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5833333333 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270017275369 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977936546163 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612778132873 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152994974059 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584027941595 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.