In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In this materialistic world, we all the like to use several modes of transportation like public transportation and private transportation. These both are very much advantageous for a majority of people to commute from one place to another place every single day in order to meet all the requirements whether it might be educational prospects or employment purpose. In this world, a fair amount people have to commute many places by railways as it is a life line for common people in many bigger cities like Mumbai, Shanghai and so on.
First of all, government should invest large sums of money in building broad gauge and narrow gauge railway lines in order to facilitate numerous railways services for shorter and longer distance places for a fair amount of people because it is a better way to diminish pollution and make cities greener and eco-friendly, in many cities in the world, a very huge number of people are depend upon railways because this is very cheaper and affordable mode of transportation. With the maximum usage of it. Prominent changes can easily be carried out in people’s life. That is why government should emphasize on modern railways’ infrastructures.
Secondly, it has been strongly noticed from many developed and developing countries that excess amount of disbursement has continuously been allocating in updating their railways transportations systems with help of scientists and engineers of their respective countries. Because it plays a paramount role in common people’s life. For instance, in Japan Bullet train has been established to provide very quicker transportation service with high amount of luxurious amenities as well as affordable rate. Many vital services through railways and bullet train are possibly provided to public at the great level. Meanwhile train journey, people feel peace of mind and sterling comfort that make them allure in traveling in railways as compared to another mode of transportations.
Thirdly, in my point of view, government should provide required amount of financial revenue on railways sector and its betterment. But this should not be done at the cost of others means of transportation. Other- wise there would be a big risk for losing their tight position over others transportations modes. Having twenty-first century’s scenarios and circumstances. Remarkable development has to be executed as quickly as possible.
To sum up, railways infrastructures as well as another important transportation systems should be revamped and well modified so many people would inspire to travel in railway as a result, the intensity of pollution would be reduced and the world would become a quite gorgeous place for stunning life standard. The atmosphere around the world may be found less polluted.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 615, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
... provided to public at the great level. Meanwhile train journey, people feel peace of min...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 97, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'railways'' or 'railway's'?
Suggestion: railways'; railway's
...required amount of financial revenue on railways sector and its betterment. But this sho...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 372, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d the world may be found less polluted.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, while, as to, for instance, as a result, as well as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2358.0 1615.20841683 146% => OK
No of words: 439.0 315.596192385 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37129840547 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16207746917 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 176.041082164 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537585421412 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 728.1 506.74238477 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 106.966818579 49.4020404114 217% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 124.105263158 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1052631579 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42105263158 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252436509177 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691871304908 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445134022462 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141399262282 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299037358618 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.