In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Other believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
People have different views regarding high-speed trains among cities. Several folks state that governments ought to impose a bigger part of the budget on building fast trains, while other people claim that this money would rather spend on the improvement of previous public transport means. In this essay, I will negotiate both views and state my own opinion.
On the one hand, some people believe that the construction of high-speed trains will contribute to more safety and efficiency in our day-to-day lives. The strongest argument is that commuters working in other cities could enter and leave cities much faster at peak hours by using fast trains as a transport mean. For example, inhabitants have never faced traffic congestion in Switzerland since the key transport mode among cities is high-speed trains. In the same way, conductors of fast speed trains are professionals and consequently because of well-qualified drivers the probability of accidents will decrease in the roads, as well as decline traffic jams during rush hours.
On the other hand, several people suppose that governments have to care more concerning the modernisation of previous public transport. First of all, authorities might renovate paths and roads, update public transport means, such as buses, trains and ferries. In addition, if power institutions industrialise the existing public transport system by decreasing the price of tickets, it will be more affordable for ordinary folks. For example, over the last few years, the government of Estonia has invested a large amount of money to the public transport system in the capital making all public transport means free to inhabitants.
In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, I believe that the construction of fast speed trains is much beneficial and important in trying to make more convenient and effective transport between cities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, regarding, so, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all, in the same way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40677966102 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83229619785 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576271186441 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6762600567 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.916666667 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5833333333 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.0 7.06120827912 198% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287244917022 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0995613582498 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504022924516 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171804311036 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308893168377 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.