One long distance of planes consumes more than a car and it can pollute environment more than cars. Therefore the unnecessary flight such as tourist travelling should be discouraged than limit the car use. Do you agree or disagree?
In the past, the trip was limited due to the insufficient transportation mode. As society and technology develop, people can travel around the world easily. Nowadays people can enjoy travel around the world and relax from travelling. By discouraging people to travel, the public's backlash is inevitable and alternative ways of travel would increase. Therefore, the environment damage would be even more severe than that of use of an aircraft.
It is undeniable that the use of aircrafts consumes more fossil gases than that of car and as a result, it can harm the environment more than that of cars. However, the disuse of flights would face the public's backlash because they cannot have more relaxation. In other words, people just get used to the way to travel by planes in this recent century and the restriction of such use would lead the public to backlash. People have enlightened the enjoyment from travel around the world and from this, people can learn various knowledge to understand other people's perspective by knowing such as culture, history and tradition. Therefore, by limiting the travel by airplane could get the backlash for limiting those experiences.
In addition to this, travelling by airplanes have been popular in this recent century for shorter time and fewer efforts. In the case of travelling from Perth to Melbourne would take about 3 hours by flight compared to a few weeks by cars. Due to this shorter travelling time, aircraft travel has gained its popularity. The limitation of travelling by airplane would not stop people travelling. People would use other methods of transportation such as cars, so that it increases the car usages. Since all the aircraft passengers have to use personal vehicles to travel, it can cause the severe environmental damages. Therefore, the use of airplane would be better than all those passengers use cars on the roads to travel.
In conclusion, despite the airplanes can cause environmental damages, it seems more severe than that of cars. However the discouraging the flights would not stop people to travel and which cause even more serious phenomenon to the environment and society. Also the public's backlash will be inevitable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 273, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
.... By discouraging people to travel, the publics backlash is inevitable and alternative ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
...r, the disuse of flights would face the publics backlash because they cannot have more ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 111, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...it seems more severe than that of cars. However the discouraging the flights would not ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 257, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...nomenon to the environment and society. Also the publics backlash will be inevitable...
^^^^
Line 7, column 266, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
...o the environment and society. Also the publics backlash will be inevitable.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1848.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13333333333 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78707333556 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455555555556 0.561755894193 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7163827956 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304851431469 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107876232957 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0961734160306 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219644918422 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366436969973 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.