Recent years witness an astonishing triumph of online shopping, as an increasing number of people incline to place orders from home. This gives rise to concerns regarding the environment alongside the demands of the labour market. In this essay, I will discuss the effects that online shopping has on such two aspects.
Firstly, the trend towards shopping through the internet seems to revolutionize the retailing industry, which in turn renders several workers redundant while giving others the chance of thriving. In online shopping, buyers stay in their home browsing through online markets, which means that it is no longer needs a large count of staff to display goods in the retailing stores, and cashiers, as they used to do in the past. Instead, the labour market is switching to favour those who can develop remote shopping platforms and operate online advertising campaigns, or driving the transporting fields flourished. For example, in Viet Nam, scarcely is it not to find dozens of shippers in the roads at a time, who co-ordinate with e-commercial companies transporting goods to their customers. In essence, the new shopping tendency exerts pressure on some occupations differently, but people may find it struggling to judge whether is it a positive or negative change.
However, the detrimental consequences of remote shopping can be outlined from the view of the environment. As mentioned earlier, was it not for online shopping, the transporting industry would not have such the nowadays proliferation and air pollution would not escalate - due to exhaust fumes. To illustrate, consumers in Northern Viet Nam now can easily place orders for clothes sale in shops in the Southern end of the country, which normally entails longer distances to deliver the products. Moreover, the environment is deteriorated even more owing to the problem of packing. Indeed, receiving goods from home results in a mountain of additional solid waste due to the package of goods while shipping; a situation when individuals order meals online, for example, which can avoid by eating at the restaurants instead.
In conclusion, the flourishing progression of shopping online has explicit impacts on the environment and job market at the same time. While this trend merely generates dynamics for several occupations to undermine others, it causes worth-considering implications on our environment.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2013.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38235294118 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97614336572 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593582887701 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4949481905 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.2 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9333333333 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187931945773 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637620859594 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048044223897 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131415668889 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628124279193 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.