Only government action can solve the housing shortage in big cities. To what extent do you agrre or disagree?
Much attention has been drawn to whether the local authority can resolve the lack of housing phenomenon. This essay, however, believes that both the government and the citizens are responsible. Not only should the government support its population with the financial aspect, but people can join hands to give charitable donations.
As for the role of government, it can provide funds for building houses. Assuming the basic needs of a person are not met, the individual himself will not make a good living, let alone contributing to his society. Therefore, the national budget should be spent on constructing apartment complexes which cost lower than the average price of the market. For instance, the outskirts areas nearby an industrial zone are suitable places to build housing without the expensive costs. The banks, moreover, can help by offering suitable form of loans for people with low income.
In terms of each citizen's role, people of higher social class can aid those of lower ones. This is due to the fact that the elite society members, who supposedly possess 50% of the total asset of a nation, own many enterprises. From this angle, these people can improve the house-shortage situation by creating job opportunities for the community. Besides, philanthropic foundations can be established to provide education for children coming from poor households. Getting a college degree is the most effective way to make money and in turn buy a house.
In conclusion, lack-of-housing can neither be the responsibility of the government nor its population, but a duty for both of the parties. While construction of housing complex from the government can be helpful, charitable donations from the rich can assist as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 18, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
... with low income. In terms of each citizens role, people of higher social class can...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, as for, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24731182796 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93884954166 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637992831541 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.0907220344 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.6 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155625870762 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522521990069 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446258529146 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105932085325 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467690344145 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.