Directors and managers of organizations are often older people. Some people say that it is better for younger people to be leaders. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
A question many leaders from international enterprises have to ask themselves is whether employing old workers is truly more worthwhile than youngster workers or not. On one hand, I am inclined to believe that as a young staff is employed by a company since he or she has graduated, that person will dedicate his or her life to fully develop that company. On the other hand, hardly can we deny that the professional and considerable experiences have taught the older regarding how they can avoid or escape struggling easily.
To assess the potential advantages of hiring young staff, we must bring the amount of income level as well as perks into focus. Assuming a business organization wanted to cut enormous costs down, engaging the youngsters were the best. Not only can that individual be adapted with the modern ecology of the workplace, but the company can also reduce the cost percentages dramatically. In addition, they can be more and more versatile in many fields without losing too much energy to learn. Another benefit is that because a younger person is virtually a white paper, the executive can train that person hard.
Although so far, one can easily draw the conclusion that new generations seem to be more energetic and effective in the work office, we must put the salient points of older ones into perspective before judging whether which one is better. Having personal experience during the periods of working in so many business areas, the holders rarely make serious mistakes even if they are lacking deadline time. For instance, they are extremely focused on working and careful whenever they have to make momentous decisions. On top of that, they no longer need to practice as an apprentice and save the number of money for their company.
Taking both sides into consideration, they point me to the conclusion that there are pros and cons to each of the sides. Regardless of the scale of the workplace, I truly suppose that it all comes down to the enterprise leader’s preferences.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, so, well, while, for instance, in addition, as well as, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1679.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95280235988 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70675289887 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628318584071 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2144913622 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.928571429 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2142857143 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0596765074428 0.244688304435 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0197597262909 0.084324248473 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0141578227507 0.0667982634062 21% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0337219214392 0.151304729494 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0120527683972 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.