The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Car accidents are increasing gradually in recent decades. In order to reduce traffic crimes, some people believe that stricter punishments should be implemented; however, I do think that it is not the only method to tackle the problem since there are other alternative measures which would be highly effective.
A stricter law undoubtedly acts as a deterrent so that both motorcyclists and drivers will have to think twice before committing a driving crime. The full weight of law including serving a long prison sentence should be practically applied instead of just a fine or banning driving license. For example, there was a truck driver who was accused of being drunk and using heroin while driving hit and killed nearly 20 motorcyclists at an intersection in Long An City, Vietnam. He chose to crush 20 people than hitting himself into another truck since only by doing that could he stay alive. Therefore, stricter punishments are considered an effective way to punish who commit driving offenses.
Although enacting a new law is recommended, there are numerous ways to solve the problem. Firstly, governments should invest money in installing speed cameras. Not until they realized that they are supervised do they control their speed. A lot of authorities worldwide have adopted this very cost-effective method. Secondly, it is necessary to conduct more regular vehicle inspections in order to avoid accidents caused by intoxicated drivers. Finally, education is a highly recommended solution which should be applied in schools. Consequently, the rate of teenagers who break driving laws will reduce significantly.
From all the above-mentioned, the implementation of a stricter law is not the only measure to improve road safety. Commuters should be more careful when traveling to protect themselves and surrounding people as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-01 | Thang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2019-03-02 | Yukita_00 | 78 | view |
- The diagrams below show how houses can be protected in areas which are prone to flooding. 73
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both views and giv 73
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?What sort of punishment should parents and 67
- The diagram below shows how solar panels can be used to provide electricity for domestic use. 84
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has this become a positive or negative development? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 546, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uld be applied in schools. Consequently, the rate of teenagers who break driving ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38620689655 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01883898591 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641379310345 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6975742963 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.625 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.125 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8125 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169017227518 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0502367429776 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067544912435 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0981434355798 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382471911492 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.