Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters (such as food, clothes, and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. other people believe that it is important for children to make decisions about matters that affect them.
There are several ideas related to how to bring up children successfully. Some parents agree to let their children make their own decision on almost daily matters; whereas others suppose that it will make kids become people who just think about their own wishes. In my opinion, I do think that we need a balance in both cases.
On the one hand, allowing children to make their own choices on every single problem assists in their future life. First of all, their self-confidence is boosted significantly because of the fact that they can choose what they like and do what they are good at. In fact, American children who are brought up by this method are far maturer and more confident than most Asian kids whose parents are overprotective and always make decisions for them during their upbringings. Second, children will more and more responsible for their choices, especially in their adult lives. Having chosen the wrong things several times results in their attitude that they have to be responsible for their decisions, even the worst ones.
On the other hand, it is said that children who are brought up freely are facing with bad moral lifestyles. In terms of morality, children are likely to become self-centered individuals. Having the right to do anything without a restriction during their childhood makes them think that they are special individuals, which is detrimentally bad for their future career. From the social perspective, hardly can those kids feel others’ suffering like since their needs always fulfilled. For example, my niece does not allow other family members to watch TV because she believes that she is the most important person in the house and everyone has the responsibility to let her enjoy her favorite cartoon channels. Therefore, she has no tolerance for others’ needs.
From all the above-mentioned, parents should allow children to make their own decisions over daily issues within an acceptable frequency in order to result in better later consequences. Our societies need more young people who are confident and selfless to join hand build a better world tomorrow.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | shihan99 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | rahulsd | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-30 | cocococo123 | 67 | view |
| 2019-03-02 | Nguyen Hong Nhung | 84 | view |
| 2019-01-28 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 78 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 72
- In the modern world it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is this a positive or negative development? 84
- The tables below give information about the sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 73
- Topic Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds Do you agree or disagree with this opinion 54
- The diagrams show the cross-sections of two tunnels, one joining France and Italy and the other joining two Japanese islands 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 177, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...elf-confidence is boosted significantly because of the fact that they can choose what they like and do w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, therefore, whereas, for example, in fact, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1781.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1325648415 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73890162431 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576368876081 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8831318927 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.3125 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6875 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351582905001 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107714496225 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0917021948601 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223635734819 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643023553707 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.