The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments
on driving offenses. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that stricter punishments will deter many motorists from driving dangerously or
carelessly on the roads. However, I strongly disagree that this is the only way to improve
road safety, because there are alternative measures which would also be effective.
Stricter punishments will undoubtedly act as a deterrent, so that motorists will think
twice before committing traffic offenses. It is often forgotten that motoring offenses are,
in fact, crimes. The full weight of the law should be applied in imposing a range of
non-custodial sentences, such as heavy fines, and the confiscation of driving licences.
The letter of the law must be strictly implemented, banning offenders from the roads so
they will no longer pose a danger to other road-users, including pedestrians. Those who
drive while intoxicated should serve a prison sentence, as is sometimes imposed in the UK, because they endanger innocent lives.
While harsh penalties for offenders should be high on the government agenda, there are
other steps which national and local authorities should take to improve road safety.
Firstly, installing speed cameras has made drivers aware of the need to adhere to speed
limits. Many authorities around the world have adopted this very cost-effective measure.
Secondly, traffic calming measures have succeeded in reducing the number of accidents,
especially in built-up areas. Finally, it is necessary to adopt a policy of conducting
regular vehicle inspections, at authorised centres, to avoid accidents caused by
mechanical failures.
In conclusion, in order to improve road safety, it is not enough to be tough on traffic
crimes by punishing more harshly those who violate the law. A range of road safety
measures should accompany harsher driving penalties.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-15 | AmazingA | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-04 | Dong Tuyen | 56 | view |
| 2019-03-02 | Giselle Bui | 11 | view |
| 2019-03-02 | Giselle Bui | 84 | view |
| 2019-01-13 | linhnganguyen | 67 | view |
- Some people argue that technological inventions such as mobile phones are making people socially less interactive. Do you agree or disagree?? 78
- Some people argue that technological inventions such as mobile phones are making people socially less interactive Do you agree or disagree 92
- Prison is the most common way in most countries to solve the problem of crime. however, a more effective solution is to provide peope a better education. Do you agree or disagree?? 61
- although more and more people read news on the internet, newspaper will remain the most important source of news. do you agree or disagree 84
- the only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offences. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.559566787 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89909004973 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635379061372 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9511203266 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 21.0 4.38176352705 479% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153959280344 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489906803402 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520499719975 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0404989698798 0.151304729494 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464646211256 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.