Over the recent few years, It has been seen that people use traffices more than previous. It is suggested that degradation of peoples travel for job education or shopping is the only way to reduce the number of vehicles. This essay will argue that there are many other ways which may reduce the traffic in cities rather than declining peoples’ travel.
To reduce heavy traffic in cities, it is needed to think something alternative. The main important method is to create other travel services like subway trums or metrorails etc. people have to need to go their work, shopping or other places. If they use other way, it will reduce traffic in roads. To cite an example, in India most of the people use subway train service, which may help them to move freely along the road despite of huge population density. In consequence, people can travel easily to their work and other hand roads are not stuck by traffics.
The other way people can think to decrease the number of o0f traffics by going anywhere with foot. People can prefer to walk for short distance rather than going with cars, buses etc. Walking may help them to fit their body as well as reduce the transports along the road. For instance, Most of the people in the western countries are visualized to walk for their works or school which reduces the transports on the cities. Moreover, people can live near to their occupation or children’s institution to go there easily within a short moment which also a better way to drop the heaps of traffics moving along the road.
To recapitulate, This essay argued that envisaging the reduction of peoples’ travel for work as the only way to decrease the traffic is preposterous. There are many other potential ways like using subway trum, walking towards occupation which should be used by people to reduce traffics in the cities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 179, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...es like subway trums or metrorails etc. people have to need to go their work, shopping...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, moreover, so, well, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84012539185 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49874920804 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501567398119 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.05439916 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9375 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6875 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30089500365 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122194761543 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785008286884 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221310077334 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04863664616 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.