In order to solve traffic problems, governments should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a solution?
The government propose a solution to tackle traffic congestion problem, that is first tax the car drivers and then use the tax money on public transportation. This solution would certainly have some positive effects on the problem, meanwhile drawbacks also exist.
The benefit of posing tax on private divers are quite obvious in terms of directly dealing with the number of cars on streets. Introducing tax could alienate people from choosing car for commuting, especially when they are swaying between private transportation and public transportation. In addition to this, the tax money could be spent on funding more continent public transportation like subway and buses.
However, the shallowness of this policy is also stunning. First of all, it is not sure if the added tax could really drive people away from driving their own cars for work. Because it is very possible that a certain amount of people drive as public transportation could not get them where they are going. Thus, tax could not solve the problem but rip hard working people off. Second, place funding on public transportation has not grounds as there may already exists a surplus of public transportation, putting more money on redundant services would be nothing but a waste of money. Thus, more research needs to be done on this issue to evaluate the solution.
To conclude, there are both advantages and disadvantages of the government proposal. But the decision has to be made on more detailed information about the problem as it could work both ways.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 411, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...c transportation like subway and buses. However, the shallowness of this policy ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, really, second, so, then, thus, while, as to, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1290.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11904761905 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83208811728 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56746031746 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9009127745 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2307692308 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3846153846 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23076923077 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248241660098 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088780649769 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0906337901241 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157530741635 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674205090703 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.