Roads and highways are the vital veins of any urban area around the world without which traveling in cities would face many problems. Nowadays the number of privet cars that are using these corridors increasing dramatically, thus traffic become an inevitable phenomenon in any city which could be addressed by different effective solutions like taxing. There are both merits and demerits to taxing the privet cars in order to control traffic that I intend to discuss.
Firstly, the benefits of this policy are worthy of note. One obvious advantage is that citizens could benefit in terms of health. Pollution is one of the deadly factors for human beings, exists in any metropolis, mainly caused by automobiles. I have recently read an article about this matter, which indicates that there is a rational correlation coefficient between contamination rooted in cars' engine in an area and rate of death in the same one. There is a further good point in view of the fact that tax could spend on the expansion of public transportation. For example, in my town, Tabriz, our city council has been executing this method for quite many years, and now, This city is one of the cleanest cities in my country. These examples clearly illustrate the importance of following this kind of actions to maintain dwellers general health.
However, there are certain disadvantages to this approach. Considering many poor members of our society would suffer financially. For example, taxi drivers are a good case in point. A vast majority of not wealthy people in a city who rely on their cars to make some money by transporting people in the city. This decision cause an unnecessary cost for them that they cannot afford it. There is another disadvantage, and it is related to the cities where their public transportation needs a lot of development to support their population demand. For an instant, when I was younger, one day I decided to use our newly opened metro in our town instead of bringing my own vehicle. It was one of the most miserable days of my life due to I reached to my destination not only approximately one hour late, but I also became exhausted for the limited subway lines, which made me walk loge distances to reach to the nearest station. Although these policies do sound constructive, without considering all groups of society and former infrastructure preparation, would be functionless.
On balance, having compared the positives and the negatives; I strongly believe that the merits by far outweigh the demerits. In my point of view, any action has been taken should consider its caveats, which in this case are poor citizens and well-equipped facilities. As a result, charging privet car owners for improving public transportation systems is a great idea that has so many beneficial side effects.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, thus, well, for example, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 46.0 24.0651302605 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2341.0 1615.20841683 145% => OK
No of words: 469.0 315.596192385 149% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99147121535 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65364457471 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84038301135 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 271.0 176.041082164 154% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577825159915 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 748.8 506.74238477 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9819284138 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.409090909 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3181818182 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04545454545 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103978638239 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0312314062388 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431144719338 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.069313882172 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025901703668 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 78.4519038076 175% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.