Nowadays, the tourism industry has witnessed an incremental shift from historical sightseeing to eco-tourism especially remote natures like deserts and glaciers. There are both advantages and disadvantages, which I intend to put into the comparative perspective.
One major benefit of visiting the wilderness is that the people, who are exhausted from the rat race of modern life, could find a peaceful place to not only relax but also enjoy of being among magnificent sceneries. These days, ancient sites like the Pyramids are given a sense of being fake due to the Disneyfication process they have been through. Therefore, should anyone likes to experience something authentic, temporarily living in nature for mind and soul refreshment would be the best way.
However, environmentally conscious people are concern about a significant drawback of this trend, that is to say, in their point of view; environmental degradation has been associated with the presence of tourists in such places. On the other hand, these environmental activists' notion is countered by the fact that the entities who consider visiting these natural attractions rather than museums and other manmade features, either are scientists or contain a minimum understanding of ecological importance of these designated areas for conservation. Even though some of them might do not know how to behave in such environments, prior compulsory education will be fruitful.
On balance, having compared both merits and demerits gives me the impression that the merits of this emerging trend by far outweigh its demerits. As a result, remote nature tourism is beneficial due to its association with human sheer relaxation. However, sight must not be lost of the importance of prerequisite instructions for this sort of tourism.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'activists'' or 'activist's'?
Suggestion: activists'; activist's
... On the other hand, these environmental activists notion is countered by the fact that th...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, therefore, as for, sort of, as a result, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46043165468 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10268011254 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68345323741 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.7995000491 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.0 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2727272727 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.81818181818 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117156953414 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0339573744021 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374662120521 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0560914550012 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042107100059 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.