Organized tour to remote areas and community is increasingly popular. Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and the environment?
Nowadays, an increased number of tourists deciding to travel to distant destinations according to package tours such as mountain areas mark a new tendency of the tourist industry. Although this development is beneficial to the local residents in terms of economy and living conditions, it can have detrimental effects on the environment of these regions.
On the one hand, with growing the number of holidaymakers visits remote areas which would encourage economic growth. To be more specific, the furthest sectors bring wild and natural beauty pristine, and contain legendary stories. Therefore, visitors coming there have a high demand for goods and services, and are most willing to pay higher than average prices. This helps to boost local economies in remote areas and eventually enhance the living standard of the local people. In addition, regarding the social-cultural aspects, travellers from everywhere in the world with different cultures can provide ethnic people in faraway places, who are almost completely isolated from the outside world, with a lot of experiences through their interaction with one another, which can help these local dwellers to broaden knowledge about a more civilized society. By contrast, local inhabitants also can introduce their customs and traditions to international friends.
However, along with the package tours bring, there are also negative effects that we need to consider. Firstly, tourists often litter where ever they go and do not bother to clean after themselves in areas they have visited. This may lead to such consequences as dirty roads or polluting the water, which negatively and directly affects local people's living. Secondly, the construction of tourism facilities like hotels can drastically change the landscape of one area, meaning the loss of habitat for local animals and plants.
In conclusion, for the aforementioned reasons, although the societies and economy in remote areas can benefit tremendously from organized tourism, I think that the negative environmental consequences that this situation brings are far more significant.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1793.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58566978193 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88828227053 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635514018692 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.6597806067 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.923076923 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6923076923 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3076923077 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255059986052 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807189820327 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478996251568 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15040779364 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0179113359811 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.