Organized tours are choosing more and more to go to remote places and communities. Do you think this a positive or nagative development for the local people and the environment?
Tourism are so important for the promotion of countries these days. Remote sites and societies are more important for tours now. It seems to me that this idea has both positive and negative effect on the natives and the environment.
We must admit traveling to deprive places will be useful for either local people or the environment if the government and people care about them carefully. For instance, not only unknown communities would be known better for tourists, but also they are encouraged to go there. Moreover it could have benefit for refining the environment.
On the other hand, visiting remote places may have negative effect. For example unspoiled nature can be changed. In addition, people who are working there may be lose their own work for some reasons. Firstly, farming lands and their products would be damaged by speculators. Further, it is possible people who live there have to leave either their own house or their properties because of roadway.
In summary, although there are both positive and negative effects on distant places, but if the government legislate reasonable laws for boosting tourism, affirmative impact will outweigh unwilling results.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 179, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t them carefully. For instance, not only unknown communities would be known bette...
^^
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...t also they are encouraged to go there. Moreover it could have benefit for refining the ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 378, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ther their own house or their properties because of roadway. In summary, altho...
^^
Line 7, column 133, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the government legislate reasonable laws for boosting tourism, affirmative impact...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in summary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 41.998997996 31% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 998.0 1615.20841683 62% => OK
No of words: 190.0 315.596192385 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25263157895 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 4.20363070211 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60685225327 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 176.041082164 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.657894736842 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 506.74238477 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.4131497109 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1666666667 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8333333333 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.91666666667 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214223179807 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748006731551 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624751148339 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121351360899 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599931048689 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.