Other ideas you could use would be that the official advice given is often wrong.
For years, the most healthy food in existence, namely butter, eggs, and red meat
have been wrongly demonized as unhealthy, and only now, 50 years later is the
truth slowly coming out. You still won’t get many “experts” saying they were
wrong. At the same time, we were told to eat lots of so-called healthy grains,
which to me is an oxymoron.
Some people believe that unhealthy food should not be allowed in stores. However, in this essay, I will challenge this school of thought.
One might argue that it is necessary for the government to impose a ban on unhealthy food, such as fast food, sugary drinks, and processed food, to name but a few. This is predicated on the assumption that there is a correlation between the consumption of these products with the rise in the rates of self-preventable diseases, such as obesity and diabetes. However, this line of reasoning is not sound because the likelihood of people getting such diseases is dependent on their lifestyle as a whole, not just their diet. In other words, those who eat fast food every day, but also work out regularly, are by no means more prone to gaining weight than those eating a healthy diet but leading a sedentary lifestyle. Another reason to reject the ban on fast food is related to the unaffordability of healthier food to a large proportion of people and the nature of today’s jobs. With regard to the former, low-income earners simply do not have a choice but to opt for fast food. Statistics suggest that the majority of fast-food eaters are from low-income brackets, meaning that they cannot afford to eat more fresh fruits, vegetables, and other types of healthy food, which are often considered extravagant items for these people.
In addition to this, for many whose hectic schedule and heavy workload do not allow them to get enough sleep, let alone spend an hour every day cooking healthy food for themselves, fast food seems to be their only choice. In concluding, for the reasons outlined above, it stands to reason that the benefits of enacting laws on the so-called “unhealthy food” are largely exaggerated and such a ban is likely to compound many people’s struggle.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, in addition, such as, in other words, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88387096774 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69218625013 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590322580645 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.6586709942 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.636363636 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1818181818 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134813032547 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545705073526 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400455561542 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0915966547556 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235264657072 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.