Parents often give children everything they ask for and do what they like. Is it good for children? What are the consequences when they grow up?
Nowadays, modern families tend to give their children permission to have everything the demand and participate in any activities they find interested. This type of policy can have a big impact on the children’s behavior and also leave them with bad consequences in the future.
To begin with, giving kids such privilege is nothing but an effective way to spoil their perception. At school, overaggressive manner can be developed because children think they are superior than other kids due to having everything they want. Such manners could lead to a bad behavior or action such as bullying which damage their social experience with the others. On the contrary of school, when at home, these kids tend to show fake obedience because they think the parents are the source of their demanding. This way of conception directly impacts on the kids’ self-confidence and dependence in the future. For example, many grown men cannot find a job and move out of parents’ houses because they lack of confidence and still rely on their parents.
With bad behavior from childhood, a low quality of life is mostly secured for the spoiled children in the future. Firstly, bad manner records from schools prove that these people will not be capable of working in groups because they cannot show respects for the other colleagues. As a consequence, they are unqualified for any high quality occupations available on the market. Secondly, with the pressure of being unemployed, these people will be forced to rely on their parents again since they know nothing to plan next.
In conclusion, I believe that spoiling children at young ages means destroying their behavior and future careers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: SUPERIOR_THAN[1]
Message: The adjective superior is normally used with 'to'.
Suggestion: to
...ecause children think they are superior than other kids due to having everything the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15217391304 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79178363607 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576086956522 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.3167156678 49.4020404114 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.384615385 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.76923076923 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255636552502 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0955201184852 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632690898838 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150779803227 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580570457628 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.