Parents or other adult relatives should make important decisions for their (13 to 19 year-old) teenage children.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your writing.
Experts throughout the developing and developed world have debated whether adults should make decisions for teenagers. In spite of the ensuing tendency to an easy life, it is now becoming increasingly clear that such discretion should be left to the children themselves to gain the maturity. This essay will discuss both views and use the examples from Hong Kong to demonstrate points.
To begin with, accepting decision from parents is intuitively perceived as the key to a promising future for average teenagers. The central reason behind this stems from the fact that parents are generally more mature and knowledgeable to make the right decision. In fact, the majority of problems that have a far-reaching consequence to the entire life of children necessitate a wide range of knowledge. Moreover, even if some of these matters are not solvable by the adults, the insights offered by the seniors are often useful. Therefore, it is conclusively clear that decisions from adult, to a considerable extent, foster the personal development of a child.
Although there is a case for fostering a better life, the downside of making decisions for juniors cannot be ignored. This is largely because such action often precludes the children from shouldering the responsibility, which in turn hinders them from becoming independent. Apparently, having accustomed to accepting decisions from parents, university students are more likely to stress on course selection. Consistent with this line of thinking is that academic strain would be ameliorated if teenagers were allowed to make choice in their childhood. Thus, it is possible to state beyond doubt that persistently taking the decisions from seniors hinder the process of acquiring life skills.
In conclusion, parents might mitigate the difficulties for their beloved children by making crucial decision for them, yet the underlying effect on weakening their life skills is by far more significant and outweigh the benefits. Given that the advent of technology can enrich one's knowledge with a few button clicks, it is predicted that parents will leave the crucial matters to their children' discretion in the foreseeable future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 278, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...hat the advent of technology can enrich ones knowledge with a few button clicks, it ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, in fact, in spite of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1850.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40935672515 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90142178077 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584795321637 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3215979342 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.333333333 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218030561652 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700279239739 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500151721308 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136605841743 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.023491793717 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.