The bar chart below gives information about four countries spending habits of shopping on consumer goods in 2012.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares the prevalence of various types of consumer products across four nations in 2012. All in all, the data differ significantly.
As shown in the information registered in 2012, cameras were in the dominate position in British consumer market, whereby a staggering 170,000 pounds was spent, exceeding its counterpart in Belgium. Likewise, the distinctions in toys and books between these two countries were in line with that of cameras, with its British figures standing at over 165,000 and over 160,000 in toys and books respectively. Noteworthy is the fact that, Spain and Austria witnessed a demand overtaking Belgium but surpassed by Britain in both books, toys and cameras.
In stark contrast, a different pattern was found in the remaining categories in 2012. In comparison to other countries, Britain saw the highest demand in cosmetics, outdoor game accessories and console games, while Austria invariably positioned at the bottom. For instance, Britain registered a figure over 155,000 in outdoor game accessories, overtaking its Austria counterpart, which was merely over 140,000.
Overall, among these six categories, the British generally spent more than its peer countries in 2012.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 65, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ion registered in 2012, cameras were in the dominate position in British consumer market, wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, likewise, so, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1036.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54010695187 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90181734613 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641711229947 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5409462059 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.111111111 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0977316784671 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0436153863373 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529886686173 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0665887308618 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377555978224 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.