Compared to the past, more younger adults take medications for degenerative diseases. Provide specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Over the past decades, it is widely believed that there has been a seismic shift in the life-style of younger generations. While some commentators advocate the colour and vibrancy of them, it remains disturbing to the fact that they are now more vulnerable to chronic diseases. The aim of this essay is set to explore the scourge behind their weakened bodies.
To begin with, there is ample evidence suggested that the prevalence of fast food shop constitutes one of the culprits of the health problem in the majority of adolescence. Coupled with the eating habit that shaped by the affordability and convenience of fast food catering in these shops, our children has accustomed to consume food that are high in fat and sugar, which in turn emasculate their immunities towards degenerative diseases such as obesity and diabetes. Recent empirical research conducted by the Medical Society ascertained that adults who have frequented in fast food shops have 70% more chances to suffer from aforementioned diseases. Consistent with this line of thinking, the unbalanced diet providing in these shops is likely to weaken the health of junior adults.
Meanwhile, another predominant factor to consider is the shortfall of outdoor activities this generation experienced. In fact, the immediacy of communication tools begot by the cutting-edge technology precludes the youngsters from chatting in a direct means, which then translates into an impediment to go hangout with friends. Conducted an extensive study, the Sport Committee established that the utilization of sport facilities owned by both public and private sectors has halved over past five years, whereby the majority of users’ age group has shifted to middle-age. Seen in this light, the immune system of average young generation were deteriorated, and patients of degenerative diseases thus become younger.
In conclusion, the observation that more young adults are perplexed by degenerative diseases is likely to be the corollary of hesitation in exercising and inadequate absorption of flourish food. It is predicted that the government will enact any measures to foster the well-being of teenagers in foreseeable future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, thus, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1855.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45588235294 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02190818288 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605882352941 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.6547730876 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.692307692 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1538461538 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07692307692 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122463687894 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.037881403825 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389098006112 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0684779592334 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0169463044898 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.5 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.