In the past, people liked to store knowledge in books. However, in the present, we prefer to store knowledge on the internet. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
In a couple of decades ago, people liked to store knowledge in books. However, in the present, it is opted to preserve people’s acquaintance by the internet due to its accessibility. From my perspective, even though this change is worthwhile, the presence of a number of hazards is conceivable.
We acquiesce that the internet provides an effortless way to search essential enlightenments without requiring readers to do some physical actions, such as reconsidering countless books. This virtue occurs because internet eases everyone to create sites freely and publish everything there. However, we cannot guarantee the credibility and accuracy of uploaded information because there is no controlling authority that can check it. Even, people can compose a writing which they are not master in it. For instance, someone without health educational background can suggest a medicine for addressing a disease just based on experience, not the result of an invention or scientific study. It is then uploaded and can be read and practiced by society immediately regardless of the validity of advice. Eventually, such ineligible post is feasible to mislead readers.
People like to utilize internet because it is better than a book in terms of its capacity, accessibility, and its availability at any point of the globe. On the other hand, those performances could ease people to do range types of crimes, such as hacking and plagiarism. We frequently watch in the news that hackers of the internet steal some huge database to their own purposes. Besides, an irresponsible blogger can duplicate shared knowledge easily and reposts it directly without permission to the author. We are easy to find plenty of blogs containing a hundred percent resemblance in their information without the courtesy of an actual source. Thus, it is absolutely a violation of the copyright.
To conclude, internet eases people to keep information, but the disadvantages outweigh the advantages in terms of its validation, safety, and authorization ethic.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, so, then, thus, while, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1725.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40752351097 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16615040814 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614420062696 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2024291317 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.470588235 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7647058824 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.29411764706 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244398587996 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691355926524 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867375018009 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157870563848 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671330424511 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.