The use of social media, such as Facebook and Twitter, is replacing face-to-face contact with many people. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Social networks, such as Facebook and Twitter, have become more well known over the days. An immense number of people frequently access them to socialize with their relatives, acquaintances, and even strangers. These platforms substitute for contacting directly, so that some hazards may occur. As long as they are accessed wisely, more positive benefits can be gained.
It is not always true that social sites mitigate the quality of people’s communication. Conversely, such media accommodate people to adequate knowledge in relation to their passion. To illustrate, one of the examples of social networks, Facebook, provides a group feature which can be utilized to discuss with other users interesting common matters. By this service, people do not need to arrange a certain place and time for sharing. Without interrupting important activities, people still have occasion to read and comment on recent topics. Moreover, the discussion can be optimized from more origins without many restrictions to get wider knowledge from several points of view.
Masses believe that social media can waste their productive time, by suffering in intelligent ways, but many benefits can be gained. For example, by the popularity of these tools, traders can advertise commerce more widely. Besides, instead of allocating their financial capital for building or renting a shop, many entrepreneurs prefer to sell their commodity virtually, which is more inexpensive and even sometimes free. Furthermore, it may be more pleasurable for customers to browse and order necessities by only accessing the company’s pages rather than wasting much time and energy to go shopping. Thus, online media makes the transactions appealing.
People’s exploitation of not only land and water but also their animals is now at the alarming rate so that the diversity loss is becoming a global problem. Accordingly, this activity should be banned by the government by establishing proper facilities, education, and punishment.
To conclude, social media have played essential roles in peoples’ activities. Even though excessive online socialization may affect negative influence, providing that we use them properly, it can enhance our lives.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, conversely, furthermore, may, moreover, so, still, thus, well, even so, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1903.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.646884273 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03926816571 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646884272997 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0633408497 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.157894737 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7368421053 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57894736842 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136967231687 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0432865067652 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406867272867 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0759986621075 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440090769344 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.19 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.